Trade Liberalization, Foreign Direct Investment Inflows, Environmental Quality and Economic Growth Nexus: A Comparative Analysis of Pakistan and China

Authors

  • Sumaira Alvi
  • Imran Sharif Chaudhry
  • Fatima Farooq
  • Noreen Safdar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v2i1.11

Keywords:

Trade Liberalization, Foreign Direct Investment, Economic Growth, Environment

Abstract

The present research endeavors to evaluate whether trade liberalization, foreign direct investment inflows and environmental quality affect the economic growth in Pakistan and China. These have crucial role in the economies and pragmatic for formulating economic growth policies. The secondary data is used for all the variables. The ARDL bounds testing approach to cointegration is applied to evaluate the determinants included in the model for both countries. The results of the research conclude that trade liberalization and foreign direct investment both have positive impact on economic growth while environmental pollution has negative impact on economic growth in long-run.

References

Aliyu, M. A. (2005, June). Foreign direct investment and the environment: Pollution haven hypothesis revisited. In Eight Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Lübeck, Germany (pp. 9-11).

Antweiler, W., Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2001). Is free trade good for the environment?. American economic review, 91(4), 877-908.

A??c?, A. A. (2013). Economic growth and its impact on environment: A panel data analysis. Ecological Indicators, 24, 324-333.

Badinger, H. (2001). Growth effects of economic integration. The case of the EU Member States (1950-2000).

Baksi, S., & Ray Chaudhuri, A. (2008). Transboundary pollution, trade liberalization, and environmental taxes.

Bilgili, F., Koçak, E., &Bulut, Ü. (2016). The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 838-845.

Blanco, L., Gonzalez, F., & Ruiz, I. (2013). The impact of FDI on CO2 emissions in Latin America. Oxford Development Studies, 41(1), 104-121.

Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic literature, 42(1), 7-71.

Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Wang, H., & Wheeler, D. (2002). Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of economic perspectives, 16(1), 147-168.

Dean, J. M. (2002). Does trade liberalization harm the environment? A new test. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienned'économique, 35(4), 819-842.

Dinda, S., &Coondoo, D. (2006). Income and emission: a panel data-based cointegration analysis. Ecological Economics, 57(2), 167-181.

Economic Survey (Various Issues)

Edward, C. P. (2010). An Influential Contribution to Economics. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol 90, 1, 7-12.

Ghosh, S. (2010). Examining carbon emissions economic growth nexus for India: a multivariate cointegration approach. Energy Policy, 38(6), 3008-3014.

Guoming, X., Cheng, Z., Yangui, Z., Shunqi, G., & Zhan, J. X. (1999). The interface between foreign direct investment and the environment: the case of China. Report as part of the UNCTAD/DICM project, cross border environmental management in transnational economies, occasional paper, (3).

He, J. (2006). Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: The case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces. Ecological economics, 60(1), 228-245.

James, W. E., &Naya, S. (1990). Trade and industrialization policies for an accelerated development in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 201-222.

Jin, J. C. (2000). Openness and growth: an interpretation of empirical evidence from East Asian countries. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 9(1), 5-17.

Khan, A. H., & Ali, S. (1998). The Experience of Trade Liberalisation in Pakistan [with Comments]. The Pakistan Development Review, 661-685.

Lewis, W. A. (2013). Theory of economic growth. Routledge.

Matei, I. (2017). Is there a Link between Renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Growth? A Dynamic Panel Investigation for the OECD Countries. Revue d'économie politique, 127(6), 985-1012.

Parikh, A., &Stirbu, C. (2004). Relationship between trade liberalisation, economic growth and trade balance: an econometric investigation..

Ramcke, L., &Abdulai, A. (2009). The Impact of Trade and Economic Growth on the Environment: Revisiting the Cross-Country Evidence. Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Working Paper, (1419).

Shaari, M. S., Hussain, N. E., Abdullah, H., & Kamil, S. (2014). Relationship among Foreign direct investment, economic growth and co2 emission: a panel data analysis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 4(4), 706-715.

Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., &Afza, T. (2014). Environmental consequences of economic growth and foreign direct investment: evidence from panel data analysis. Bulletin of Energy Economics (BEE), 2(2), 14-27.

Zaman, K., Moemen, M. A. E., & Islam, T. (2017). Dynamic linkages between tourism transportation expenditures, carbon dioxide emission, energy consumption and growth factors: evidence from the transition economies. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(16), 1720-1735.

Zomorrodi, A., & Zhou, X. (2017). Impact of FDI on Environmental Quality of China. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 4(1), 1-15

Downloads

Published

2019-06-30

How to Cite

Alvi, S. ., Chaudhry, I. S. ., Farooq, F. ., & Safdar, N. . (2019). Trade Liberalization, Foreign Direct Investment Inflows, Environmental Quality and Economic Growth Nexus: A Comparative Analysis of Pakistan and China. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 2(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v2i1.11

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>