A Nonlinear Analysis of the Relationship between Urbanization and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Pakistan: A Fresh Evidence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v5i4.276Keywords:
Urbanization, Foreign Direct Investment, Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Access to Electricity, Institutional Quality, NARDLAbstract
The nature of the linkage between urbanization and carbon dioxide emissions has been a point of concern among researchers, policy makers and environmentalists for the last three decades. Due to the rapid economic growth and social progress in urban areas, a considerable part of rural labor force have migrated to urban areas for jobs, education and health facilities. It results in significant increase in energy requirements in urban areas that have caused several challenges related to ecological pollution. Pakistan is one of the developing nations with a rapid rate of urbanization as well as varying economic growth rate. This study analyzes the relationship between urbanization and carbon dioxide emissions in the presence of institutional quality, foreign direct investment and access to electricity. For analysis purpose, the study uses nonlinear ARDL estimation technique on Pakistani data for the period 1984-2020. The results show that the partial sum of positive/negative changes in urbanization are positively/negatively connected with carbon dioxide emissions. Furthermore, foreign direct investment inflows cause environmental degradation, while access to electricity is positively connected with carbon dioxide emissions in the long run. But, institutional quality considerably declines carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan. The study concludes that positive part of urbanization has more significant effect than the negative counterpart. The study recommends that there is a need to promote economic friendly energy consumption pattern for improving the quality of environment in Pakistan.
References
Acharyya, J. (2009). FDI, growth and the environment: Evidence from India on CO2 emission during the last two decades. Journal of economic development, 34(1), 43.
Ahmed, Z., Wang, Z., & Ali, S. (2019). Investigating the non-linear relationship between urbanization and CO2 emissions: an empirical analysis. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 12(8), 945-953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-019-00711-x
Awan, A., Sadiq, M., Hassan, S. T., Khan, I., & Khan, N. H. (2022). Combined nonlinear effects of urbanization and economic growth on CO2 emissions in Malaysia. An application of QARDL and KRLS. Urban Climate, 46, 101342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101342
Bekhet, H. A., & Othman, N. S. (2017). Impact of urbanization growth on Malaysia CO2 emissions: Evidence from the dynamic relationship. Journal of cleaner production, 154, 374-388.
Cole, M. A., & Neumayer, E. (2004). Examining the impact of demographic factors on air pollution. Population and Environment, 26(1), 5-21.
Ehigiamusoe, K. U., Lean, H. H., Babalola, S. J., & Poon, W. C. (2022). The roles of financial development and urbanization in degrading environment in Africa: Unravelling non-linear and moderating impacts. Energy Reports, 8, 1665-1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.12.048
Grimes, P., & Kentor, J. (2003). Exporting the greenhouse: foreign capital penetration and CO? Emissions 1980 1996. journal of world-systems research, 261-275.
Hashmi, S. H., Fan, H., Habib, Y., & Riaz, A. (2021). Non-linear relationship between urbanization paths and CO2 emissions: A case of South, South-East and East Asian economies. Urban Climate, 37, 100814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100814
Hunjra, A. I., Tayachi, T., Chani, M. I., Verhoeven, P., & Mehmood, A. (2020). The moderating effect of institutional quality on the financial development and environmental quality nexus. Sustainability, 12(9), 3805.
Huo, T., Cao, R., Du, H., Zhang, J., Cai, W., & Liu, B. (2021). Nonlinear influence of urbanization on China's urban residential building carbon emissions: New evidence from panel threshold model. Science of The Total Environment, 772, 145058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145058
Kocoglu, M., Awan, A., Tunc, A., & Aslan, A. (2022). The nonlinear links between urbanization and CO2 in 15 emerging countries: evidence from unconditional quantile and threshold regression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(12), 18177-18188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16816-9
Lau, L. S., Choong, C. K., & Eng, Y. K. (2014). Carbon dioxide emission, institutional quality, and economic growth: empirical evidence in Malaysia. Renewable energy, 68, 276-281.
Liang, W., & Yang, M. (2019). Urbanization, economic growth and environmental pollution: Evidence from China. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 21, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2018.11.007
Liddle, B. (2013). Population, affluence, and environmental impact across development: evidence from panel cointegration modeling. Environmental modelling & software, 40, 255-266.
Liu, X., Sun, T., Feng, Q., & Zhang, D. (2020). Dynamic nonlinear influence of urbanization on China’s electricity consumption: Evidence from dynamic economic growth threshold effect. Energy, 196, 117187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117187
Munir, K., & Ameer, A. (2022). Assessing nonlinear impact of urbanization, economic growth, technology, and trade on environment: evidence from African and Asian emerging economies. Geo Journal, 87(3), 2195-2208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10366-2
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of applied econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
Phillips, P. C., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
Raza, S. A., Qureshi, M. A., Ahmed, M., Qaiser, S., Ali, R., & Ahmed, F. (2021). Non-linear relationship between tourism, economic growth, urbanization, and environmental degradation: evidence from smooth transition models. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(2), 1426-1442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10179-3
Salman, M., Long, X., Dauda, L., & Mensah, C. N. (2019). The impact of institutional quality on economic growth and carbon emissions: Evidence from Indonesia, South Korea and Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118331.
Tiba, S. (2019). A non-linear assessment of the urbanization and climate change nexus: The African context. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(31), 32311-32321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06475-2
Wang, Q., & Wang, L. (2021). The nonlinear effects of population aging, industrial structure, and urbanization on carbon emissions: A panel threshold regression analysis of 137 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 125381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125381
Wang, X., & Zhou, D. (2021). Exploring the nonlinear impact of urbanization on pollutant emissions: a spatial approach. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 12(11), 101220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2021.101220
World Development Indicators (WDI) (2020) https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS?locations=PK
Xie, Q., & Liu, J. (2019). Combined nonlinear effects of economic growth and urbanization on CO2 emissions in China: evidence from a panel data partially linear additive model. Energy, 186, 115868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.115868
Xing, Y., & Kolstad, C. D. (2002). Do lax environmental regulations attract foreign investment?. Environmental and Resource Economics, 21(1), 1-22.
Zhang, Y., & Chen, X. (2022). Spatial and nonlinear effects of new-type urbanization and technological innovation on industrial carbon dioxide emission in the Yangtze River Delta. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24113-2
Zhu, J., Ding, N., Li, D., Sun, W., Xie, Y., & Wang, X. (2020). Spatiotemporal analysis of the nonlinear negative relationship between urbanization and habitat quality in metropolitan areas. Sustainability, 12(2), 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020669
