AI as a Cognitive Assistant Investigating It's Role in Enhancing Memory Attention and Learning Outcomes

Authors

  • Syed Azhar Hussain Chairperson, Department of Education, Govt. Islamia Graduate College Civil Lines, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Abdul Haseeb Shaikh London South Bank University
  • Rao Hamza Jamil University Of Roehampton
  • Muhammad Adnan Sial Departemnt of Sociology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v8i3.558

Keywords:

Cognitive Assistants, Memory Retention, Attention, Learning Outcomes, Academic Achievement, AI in Education, Self-Regulated Learning, Educational Technology.

Abstract

The current research examined how cognitive assistants can improve the memory outcome, focus, and general learning performance among Pakistani teachers. The quantitative research design was used and 200 teachers were used to collect data by use of self-administered questionnaire. Regression, multiple regression, correlation, and ANOVA tests were done to investigate the effects of using cognitive assistants and cognitive performance. The results showed that cognitive assistants had a high positive effect on memory retention (B = 0.621, p < 0.001) and attention/focus ( r= 0.578, p < 0.01). Further results of multiple regression showed that cognitive assistants along with memory retention and attention had a significant influence on overall learning outcomes (R2 = 0.610, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that cognitive assistants are useful external cognitive aids that decrease cognitive load, enhance focus, and lead to self-regulated learning. The research presents the significance of introducing AI-based cognitive technologies in learning environments to improve academic achievement and student interaction. Some of the recommended measures are training of teachers, customized learning, and constant evaluation of AI-based interventions, but the future studies can focus on the impacts in the long term and domain-specific use. 

References

Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., Farrell, R., & Reiser, B. (1984). Cognitive principles in the design of computer tutors. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 6).

Chalmers, P. A. (2003). The role of cognitive theory in human–computer interface. Computers in human behavior, 19(5), 593-607.

Chen, C. H., & Chang, C. L. (2024). Effectiveness of AI-assisted game-based learning on science learning outcomes, intrinsic motivation, cognitive load, and learning behavior. Education and Information Technologies, 29(14), 18621-18642.

Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K., & Hadley, W. S. (2001). Cognitive tutors: From the research classroom to all classrooms. In Technology enhanced learning (pp. 215-240). Routledge.

De Aldama Sánchez, C. (2020). Cognitive enhancement or cognitive diminishing? Digital technologies and challenges for education from a situated perspective.

Dempsey, R. P., Coin, A., & Dubljevi?, V. (2024). Is the Internet a Cognitive Enhancement?. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 8(1), 155-169.

Jeong, S., Kim, J., & Lee, J. (2024). The differential effects of multisensory attentional cues on task performance in vr depending on the level of cognitive load and cognitive capacity. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 30(5), 2703-2712.

Johnson, C. I., Bailey, S. K., Schroeder, B. L., & Marraffino, M. D. (2022). Procedural learning in virtual reality: The role of immersion, interactivity, and spatial ability.

Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Megowan-Romanowicz, C., Birchfield, D. A., & Savio-Ramos, C. (2016). Effects of embodied learning and digital platform on the retention of physics content: Centripetal force. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1819.

Kim, D., Choi, Y. R., Lee, Y. N., Park, W. H., Kwon, D. Y., & Chang, S. O. (2025). Adaptive Learning for Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia in Nursing Homes: A Quasi-Experimental Study. SAGE Open, 15(3), 21582440251367285.

Kim, Y., Kang, Y., Kim, B., Kim, J., & Kim, G. H. (2025). Exploring the role of engagement and adherence in chatbot-based cognitive training for older adults: memory function and mental health outcomes. Behaviour & Information Technology, 44(10), 2405-2417.

Li, P., & Lan, Y. J. (2022). Digital language learning (DLL): Insights from behavior, cognition, and the brain. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(3), 361-378.

Miller, M. D. (2014). Minds online: Teaching effectively with technology. Harvard University Press.

Nguyen, N. L., & Nguyen, T. P. L. (2025). The Impact of Implementing AI-Generated Audio Transcriptions on English Majors’ Cognitive Load. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 16(1), 140-158.

Park, D. C., Lodi-Smith, J., Drew, L., Haber, S., Hebrank, A., Bischof, G. N., & Aamodt, W. (2014). The impact of sustained engagement on cognitive function in older adults: The Synapse Project. Psychological science, 25(1), 103-112.

Park, E., Yun, B. J., Min, Y. S., Lee, Y. S., Moon, S. J., Huh, J. W., ... & Jung, T. D. (2019). Effects of a mixed reality-based cognitive training system compared to a conventional computer-assisted cognitive training system on mild cognitive impairment: a pilot study. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 32(3), 172-178.

Park, S. (2015). The effects of social cue principles on cognitive load, situational interest, motivation, and achievement in pedagogical agent multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 211-229.

Park, S. M., Ho, M., Lin, M. P. C., & Ryoo, J. (2025, April). Evaluating the Impact of Assistive AI Tools on Learning Outcomes and Ethical Considerations in Programming Education. In 2025 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1-10). IEEE.

Preum, S. M., Munir, S., Ma, M., Yasar, M. S., Stone, D. J., Williams, R., ... & Stankovic, J. A. (2021). A review of cognitive assistants for healthcare: Trends, prospects, and future directions. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53(6), 1-37.

Rivera, N. (2024). Understanding How CTE Educators Perceive That Professional Development Supports Educational Practices and Retention (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).

Thompson, J. L., Beltran-Najera, I., Johnson, B., Morales, Y., & Woods, S. P. (2022). Evidence for neuropsychological health disparities in Black Americans with HIV disease. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 36(2), 388-413.

Thompson, T. S. (2025). Transforming Teaching Through Learning Sciences: Leveraging Perceptual Cues, Student Errors, and Technology for Enhanced Mathematics Instruction (Doctoral dissertation, WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE).

Tracy, K., & Spantidi, O. (2025). Impact of GPT-driven teaching assistants in VR learning environments. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

Weidman, J., & Baker, K. (2015). The cognitive science of learning: concepts and strategies for the educator and learner. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 121(6), 1586-1599.

Yeo, S. (2024). The application of cognitive teaching and learning strategies to instruction in medical education. Korean Medical Education Review, 26(1), S1-S12.

Zhang, Y., Yang, J., & Wen, Z. (2022). Learners with low working memory capacity benefit more from the presence of an instructor’s face in video lectures. Journal of Intelligence, 11(1), 5.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Hussain, S. A., Shaikh, A. H. ., Jamil, R. H. ., & Sial, M. A. (2025). AI as a Cognitive Assistant Investigating It’s Role in Enhancing Memory Attention and Learning Outcomes. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v8i3.558