Evaluating AI-Supported Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study of Student Performance, Self-Regulation, and Parental Roles

Authors

  • Habib Ahmed Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Rafiq Anjum Director Research, Spine Innovation Research and Educational Services, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Zehra Abdul Ahad Research Associate, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Shaheed Benazirabad, Pakistan
  • Alia Umar M.Phil. Scholar (Zoology), University of Okara, Okara, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v8i4.651

Keywords:

AI-supported learning, academic performance, self-regulated learning, parental involvement, mixed-methods research, educational technology, thematic analysis, digital learning

Abstract

This study examines the impact of AI-supported learning on student academic performance, self-regulated learning, and parental involvement through a mixed-methods research design conducted in Multan. Data were collected from selected colleges and universities as well as households in Multan, Punjab, Pakistan, where students are actively engaged in AI-supported and digital learning environments. This study utilized a convergent parallel mixed methods design, combining quantitative and qualitative information to supply a thorough understand of AI-supported academic practices. A structured Likert scale questionnaire was administered to 224 students and 8 semi-structured interviews with students and parents were conducted to gather quantitative data and qualitative data respectively. An analysis of statistical data was carried out with SPSS through descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, regression analysis and ANOVA, while the thematic analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data in order to find out the common features and themes. The result showed that there was a strong positive correlation between the application of AI-supported learning and academic performance (r = 0.612, p < 0.01) that means that the more students use AI, the higher their academic performance is. Finally, using regression analysis, it was found that AI-supported learning has a significant effect on self-regulated learning (R² = 0.346, ? = 0.588, p < 0.001), which indicates that AI technologies can predict students' SRL ability in planning, monitoring and evaluating learning processes. Furthermore, ANOVA results showed that the differences among parental involvement levels according to the level of use of AI-supported learning were significant (F = 24.56, p < 0.001), demonstrating the crucial role of parental supervision and guidance in students' utilization of AI technology. Some of the key advantages of AI-integrated learning that came to light in the thematic findings were enhanced understanding, personalization, motivation and support. There was also a complaint that the students were relying too heavily on AI, not thinking through their work, cheating, and privacy issues and spending too much time on their screens. Parents were identified as a key role as supports responsible learning behaviors and monitoring AI usage. Last, and most promising, AI application in learning, if used appropriately and ethically, and coupled with appropriate and ethical parent involvement and engagement in children's learning, offers great promise in enriching education and student performance.

References

Afzaal, M., Shanshan, X., & El-Dakhs, D. A. S. (2024). A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of speech acts in international journals (2013–2023). Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2380556.

Alatoai, A. A., & Alshahri, A. S. (2025). The development and validation of the AI-supported self-regulated science and mathematics learning scale (AI-SSRSML) among secondary school students in Saudi Arabia. BMC psychology.

Antoninis, M., Alcott, B., Al Hadheri, S., April, D., Fouad Barakat, B., Barrios Rivera, M., ... & Weill, E. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms?.

Babayev, J. (2025). Algorithmic Autonomy or Dependence? A Mixed-Methods Study on AI Personalization and Self-Regulated Learning in Higher Education. Journal of Azerbaijan Language and Education Studies, 2(4), 32-39.

Banihashem, S. K., Bond, M., Bergdahl, N., Khosravi, H., & Noroozi, O. (2024). A Systematic Mapping Review at the Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Self-Regulated Learning: A call for increased theoretical grounding, focus on motivation and diversifying context. Preprint] DOI: https://doi. org/10.13140/RG, 2(13057.47207).

Besas, J., Patac, L., & Patac Jr, A. (2026). AI-Facilitated Self-Directed Learning and Mathematics Performance: A Mixed-Methods Study on ChatGPT Use among Generation Z Students. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 13(1), 15-30.

Engeness, I. (2025). Exploring AI-generated feedback in peer-discussion contexts: A mixed-methods study of essay writing in secondary classrooms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100504.

García-Martínez, I., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & León, S. P. (2023). Analysing the impact of artificial intelligence and computational sciences on student performance: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(1), 171-197.

Heikkinen, S., Saqr, M., Malmberg, J., & Tedre, M. (2023). Supporting self-regulated learning with learning analytics interventions–a systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 3059-3088.

Hou, F., & Zhou, C. (2025). How AI shapes self-regulated learning in foreign language education. Discover Computing, 28(1), 344.

Jin, M., Wen, Q., Liang, Y., Zhang, C., Xue, S., Wang, X., ... & Xiong, H. (2023). Large models for time series and spatio-temporal data: A survey and outlook. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10196.

Lehikko, A., & Nykänen, M. (2024, August). A mixed-methods study on learner-ivr interactivity, agency, cognitive load and learning outcomes. In European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction SIG 6 & 7 Conference 2024: Instructional Design, Technology-Enhanced Learning and Instruction.

Li, J., Yuyang, Y., & Xiaojun, Z. (2025). Exploring artificial intelligence in inclusive education: A systematic review of empirical studies. Applied Sciences, 15(23), 12624.

Li, S., & Lin, J. (2025). Enhancing academic engagement and needs satisfaction through AI: A mixed?methods study in Chinese EFL tertiary education context. European Journal of Education, 60(2), e70110.

Saifuddin, M. F., & Putra, L. D. (2024). Digital literacy in elementary school: A systematic literature review. Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(2), 86-99.

Tobbi, S. (2025). AI-Mediated Oral Practice and the Dynamics of Anxiety, Performance, and Self-Regulation: A Mixed-Methods Comparison of Instructional Modes. Teaching Innovations/Inovacije u Nastavi, 38(4).

Villareal, D. T. (2023). Obesity and accelerated aging. The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 27(5), 312-313.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Ahmed, H., Anjum, M. R., Ahad, Z. A., & Umar, A. (2025). Evaluating AI-Supported Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study of Student Performance, Self-Regulation, and Parental Roles. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 8(4), 1779-1793. https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v8i4.651