Judicial Activism and Its Implications for Good Governance: A Case for Judicial Reforms in Pakistan

Authors

  • Nauman Reayat Department of Political Science, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan
  • Neelam Farid Department of Sociology, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Kamran Khan Department of Management Sciences & Commerce, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda, Pakistan
  • Anwarul Mujahid Shah Department of Sociology, Political Science and Education, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v4i1.94

Keywords:

Judicial Activism, Good Governance, Judicial Reforms, Supreme Court of Pakistan

Abstract

Judicial activism plays an important role in shaping various countries' political contexts with different political systems and regime types. Academic literature and debates are divided among various groups in favour and against judicial activism. This work reviews range of available data to probe case of judicial activism in Pakistan from 2005 to 2013. Judicial activism in Pakistan seemed to be short-lived and selective in nature. The Supreme Court of Pakistan (SCP) exercised activism without limits in cases against representative parliamentarians who were already constrained in many matters by other unconstitutional powers. No doubt, it reviewed various malpractices of the executive in the domain of public policy and governance, which enhanced its legitimacy and popularity. A vibrant media further contributed to the Court's popularity. But the transgression of institutional boundaries by the apex court for 'pious' objectives failed to introduce judicial reforms and eradication of corruption in the lower judiciary. Selectivity in the SCP activism was visible in its limitation to implement some of its verdicts against ex-military officers. This paper discusses these contradictions within the activism by the higher judiciary in Pakistan, and suggests various recommendations in the latter part of the paper.

References

Acemoglu, Daren and Robinson, James A(2012).Why Nations Fail: The Origins Of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty.New York: Crown Publishers.

Baxter, Craig. (2004). Pakistan on the Brink Politics, Economics, and Society. Karachi: Oxford University.

Basedau, Matthias. (2007). Do Party Systems Matter for Democracy? in: Basedau, Matthias et al. (ed.), Votes, Money and Violence. Political Parties and Elections in Africa, Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute, pp. 105-143.

Bendel, Petra / Grotz, Florian.(2001): Parteiensysteme und Demokratisierung. Junge Demokratien in Africa, Asian and Latin America im Vergleich, in: Nord-Süd aktuell, No. 1, Vol. 15, pp. 70-80.

Barro, Robert. (1997). Determinants of economic growth: A cross country empirical study.

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Barro, Robert. (2000). Rule of law, democracy, and economic performance. In 2000 index of Economic Freedom, ed.

Bollen, Kenneth A. (1993). “Liberal democracy: Validity and method factors in cross national measures”. American Journal of Political Science.

Barlatsky, Noah. (2011).Judicial Activism.Michigan: Cengage Gale.

Caldeira, Gregory. (1986). "Neither the Purse nor the Sword: Dynamics of Public Confidence in the Supreme Court." American Political Science Review 80:1209-1226.

Carrubba, Cliff. (2000). "The Politics of Supranational Legal Integration: National Governments, the European Court of Justice, and Development of EU Law."Annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.

Dix, Robert H.(1992).Democratization and the Institutionalization of Latin American Political Parties, in: Comparative Political Studies, No. 4, Vol. 24, pp. 488-511.

Edgardo Buscaglia, William Ratliff and Robert Cooter Jai. Eds. Law and Economics of Development Eds Press Inc. Greenwich, Connecticut and London, England.

Farwell, James. P and Joseff D.Duffey.The Pakistan Cauldron: Conspiracy, Assassination and Instability.Washington D.C.:Potomac Books Inc,2011.

Fair, C.Christine, Keith Crane, Christopher S.Chivis, Samir Puri, Michael. Spirtas. (, 2010).

Pakistan: Can The United States Secure An Insecure State.Pittsburg: RAND Corporation.

Gibson, James, Gregory Caldeira, and Vanessa Baird. (1998). "On the Legitimacy of National High Courts." American Political Science Review 92:343-358. http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english online/Politics/22-Nov-2009/Murder-embezzlement–balwa-amongst-the-pardoned crimes/1

Harwood, Sterling. (1996).Restraining Judicial Activism.University of Michigan: Austin and Winfield.

Huntington,S.P.(1968). Political Order in Changing Society.New Haven: Yale University Press.

Janda, Kenneth. (1980).Political Parties: A Cross-National Survey. New York: Free Press.

Joireman, Sandra F. (2001). “Inherited legal systems and effective rule of law: Africa and the colonial legacy”. Journal of Modern African Studies 39:571-96.

Joireman, Sandra F. (2004). Colonization and the rule of law: Comparing the effectiveness of common law and civil law countries. Constitutional Political Economy.

Kommers.Donald. P and Russel A.Miller(2012).The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany.Duke University Press.

Kuenzi, Michelle / Lambright, Gina. (2005). Party Systems and Democratic Consolidation in Africa’s Electoral Regimes, Party Politics, No. 4, Vol. 11, pp. 423-446.

Knack, Stephen. (2006). Measuring corruption in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: A critique of the cross-country indicators.World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.

Khan, Hamid. (2009).Constitutional and Political History of Pakistan.London: Oxford University Press.

Leuchtenburg, William. (1995). The Supreme Court Reborn: The Constitutional Revolution in the Age of Roosevelt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Levitsky, Steven. (1998). Institutionalization and Peronism, in: Party Politics, No. 1, Vol. 4, 77-92.

Lindberg, Staffan. (2007). Institutionalization of party systems? Stability and fluidity among legislative parties in Africa's democracies, in: Government and Opposition, No. 2, Vol. 42, 215-241.

Lindquist, Stefanie.A and Cross.Frank.B.(2009). Measuring Judicial Activism. Oxford University Press.

Malik, Anas. (2011). Political Survival in Pakistan Beyond Ideology. New York: Routledge.1-10.

Mayhew, David. (1974). Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University

Press.

Mainwaring, Scott (1998): Party Systems in the Third Wave, in: Journal of Democracy, No. 3, Vol. 9, pp. 57-81.

Mainwaring, Scott / Scully, Timothy (ed.).(1995).Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp.

Murphy, Walter, and Joseph Tannenhaus. ( 1990). "Publicity, Public Opinion, and the Court." Northwestern University Law Review 84:985-1023.

Munck, Gerardo, and Jay Verkuilen. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices. Comparative Political Studies.

Mollah, Md. Awal Hossain. (2008). Judiciary and Good Governance in Bangladesh. South Asian Survey 15: 245. http://sas.sagepub.com/content/15/2/245.

North, Douglas. (1993). Institutions and Credible Commitment, in: Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol No (149).11-23.

Omar, Imtiaz. (2002). Emergency Powers And The Courts In India And Pakistan.The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

Razaque, Jona. (2004).Public Interest Environmental Litigation in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.London: Kluwer Law International.

Roosevelt, Kermit. (2006).The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions.US Congress: Kermit Roosevelt.

Rigobon, Roberto, and Dani Rodrick. (2005). Rule of law, democracy, openness, and income. Economics of Transitions.

Sampford, Charles, Arthur Shacklock, Carmel Connors, and Fredrik Galtung. (2006). Measuring Corruption. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

Vanberg, George. (2000). Establishing Judicial Independence in Germany: The Impact of Opinion Leadership and the Separation of Powers. Comparative Politics.32:333-353.

Vanberg, George. (Apr. 2001). Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review. American Journal of Political Science.Vol. 45, No. 2 pp. 346-361.

Weingast, Barry. (1997). "The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law." American Political Science Review.91:245-263.

Wolfe, Christofer. (2011). Judicial Activism Bulwark of Freedom or Precarious Society.Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

Verdicts of Supreme Court of Pakistan:

Using Patel and other VS Crown.

Miss Asma Jilani Vs the Government of the Punjab.

Nawaz Sharif Vs Federation of Pakistan.

Sindh High Court Bar Association v Federation of Pakistan. (2009) PLD SC 879.

Maulvi Tameezudeen Khan Case.

The State Vs Dosso and Others.

Nusrat Bhutto Vs Chief of Army Staff and Others

Federation of Pakistan Vs Hajji Muhammad Saif Ullah Khan.

Khawaja Tariq Rahim Vs Federation of Pakistan.

Benazir Bhutto Vs President of Pakistan.

Zafar Ali Shah v the Chief Executive of Pakistan General Pervez Musharaf 2000.

Pakistan Lawyers Forum case (2005).

Suo Motu case No 24 of 2010 (2011)PLD SC 963.

Suo Motu Case No 15 of 2009 (2012) PLD SC 610.

Suo Motu Case No 13 of 2009 (2011) PLD SC 619.

Re Tariq Azzizudin and Other (2010) SCMR 1301

Shahid Orakzai v Pakistan through Secretary Law (2011) PLD SC 365.

Suo Motu Case 10 of 2005 (2010) SCMR 361.

Suo Moto Case 18 of 2010 (2011) PLD SC 821.

Bank of Punjab v Haris Steel Industries (2010) PLD SC 1109.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-18

How to Cite

Reayat, N. ., Farid, N. ., Khan , M. K. ., & Shah, A. M. . (2021). Judicial Activism and Its Implications for Good Governance: A Case for Judicial Reforms in Pakistan. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 4(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v4i1.94